INTEGROS® Complete Standards &
Modules Index

Integrity Governance Architecture —
Integrity Governance Layer

Official Integrity Governance Architecture Map for AI Systems, Autonomous
Systems, Digital Assets, Organizations, Critical Infrastructure, and Future
Operational Environments

This document serves as the official OOF® integrity governance architecture
map and structural index used for integrity governance design, integrity
governance navigation, integrity governance classification, integrity
diagnostics, integrity architecture development, integrity governance
validation, and integrity interoperability across AI systems, autonomous
systems, organizations, digital assets, critical infrastructure, and future
operational environments.

INTEGROS® consists of 10 Parent Standards and 50 Core Modules.

Additional standards and modules may be added when new governable integrity
spaces are identified. However, the standards and modules listed below form
the core structural backbone of INTEGROS®.

1. Integrity Definition Standard (INDS)

Governed Space: Integrity Definition

Core Question: How can integrity be formally defined as a governable
operational reality?

Modules:

IDIM — Integrity Definition Identification Module
IDSM — Integrity Definition Structure Module
IDVM — Integrity Definition Validation Module
IDCM — Integrity Definition Classification Module
IDDM — Integrity Definition Documentation Module

2. Integrity Structure Standard (STIS)

Governed Space: Integrity Structure

Core Question: How should integrity be structurally organized so that it can
be consistently governed?

Modules:

ISCM — Integrity Structure Components Module
ISRM — Integrity Structure Relationships Module
ISVM — Integrity Structure Validation Module
ISAM — Integrity Structure Assessment Module
ISDM — Integrity Structure Documentation Module

3. Integrity Conditions Standard (ICS)

Governed Space: Integrity Conditions

Core Question: Under which governed conditions can integrity legitimately
exist, be preserved, and remain operationally valid?

Modules:

ICRM — Integrity Conditions Requirements Module
ICVM — Integrity Conditions Validation Module
ICOM — Integrity Conditions Observation Module
ICMM — Integrity Conditions Monitoring Module
ICDM — Integrity Conditions Documentation Module

4. Integrity Measurement Standard (IMS)

Governed Space: Integrity Measurement

Core Question: How can integrity be objectively measured, evaluated, and
demonstrated?

Modules:

IMMM — Integrity Metrics Module
IMCM — Integrity Measurement Collection Module
IMVM — Integrity Measurement Validation Module
IMAM — Integrity Measurement Analysis Module
IMRM — Integrity Measurement Reporting Module

5. Integrity State Standard (ISS)

Governed Space: Integrity State

Core Question: What is the current integrity state of a governed entity, and
how can that state be objectively determined?

Modules:

ISAM — Integrity State Assessment Module
ISCM — Integrity State Classification Module
ISVM — Integrity State Validation Module
ISMM — Integrity State Monitoring Module
ISDM — Integrity State Documentation Module

6. Integrity Deviation Standard (IDS)

Governed Space: Integrity Deviation

Core Question: When does integrity begin to deviate from approved conditions,
and how can that deviation be governed before it becomes a breach?

Modules:

IDIM — Integrity Deviation Identification Module
IDAM — Integrity Deviation Assessment Module
IDVM — Integrity Deviation Validation Module
IDMM — Integrity Deviation Monitoring Module
IDDM — Integrity Deviation Documentation Module

7. Integrity Breach Standard (IBS)

Governed Space: Integrity Breach

Core Question: When does an integrity deviation become a governed integrity
breach requiring formal governance intervention?

Modules:

IBIM — Integrity Breach Identification Module
IBVM — Integrity Breach Validation Module
IBAM — Integrity Breach Assessment Module
IBNM — Integrity Breach Notification Module
IBDM — Integrity Breach Documentation Module

8. Integrity Response Standard (IRS)

Governed Space: Integrity Response

Core Question: How should verified integrity breaches be governed, contained,
and managed to minimize operational impact?

Modules:

IRAM — Integrity Response Authorization Module
IRCM — Integrity Response Coordination Module
IREM — Integrity Response Execution Module
IRESM — Integrity Response Escalation Module
IRDM — Integrity Response Documentation Module

9. Integrity Restoration Standard (IRRS)

Governed Space: Integrity Restoration

Core Question: How can integrity be objectively restored after a verified
breach while preserving governance accountability and evidence?

Modules:

IRPM — Integrity Restoration Planning Module
IREXM — Integrity Restoration Execution Module
IRVM — Integrity Restoration Validation Module
IREVM — Integrity Restoration Evidence Module
IRDM — Integrity Restoration Documentation Module

10. Integrity Assurance Standard (IAS)

Governed Space: Integrity Assurance

Core Question: How can restored integrity remain continuously verified,
demonstrable, and governably assured throughout the complete operational
lifecycle?

Modules:

IAMM — Integrity Assurance Monitoring Module
IAVM — Integrity Assurance Validation Module
IAEM — Integrity Assurance Evidence Module
IARM — Integrity Assurance Reporting Module
IAOM — Integrity Assurance Oversight Module

INTEGROS® Architecture Summary

Parent Standards: 10

Core Modules: 50

Core Governed Integrity Spaces

Integrity Definition Integrity Structure Integrity Conditions Integrity
Measurement Integrity State Integrity Deviation Integrity Breach Integrity
Response Integrity Restoration Integrity Assurance

INDS → How can integrity be formally defined as a governable operational
reality?

STIS → How should integrity be structurally organized so that it can be
consistently governed?

ICS → Under which governed conditions can integrity legitimately exist, be
preserved, and remain operationally valid?

IMS → How can integrity be objectively measured, evaluated, and demonstrated?

ISS → What is the current integrity state of a governed entity, and how can
that state be objectively determined?

IDS → When does integrity begin to deviate from approved conditions, and how
can that deviation be governed before it becomes a breach?

IBS → When does an integrity deviation become a governed integrity breach
requiring formal governance intervention?

IRS → How should verified integrity breaches be governed, contained, and
managed to minimize operational impact?

IRRS → How can integrity be objectively restored after a verified breach while
preserving governance accountability and evidence?

IAS → How can restored integrity remain continuously verified, demonstrable,
and governably assured throughout the complete operational lifecycle?

Architectural Position

INTEGROS® governs the complete integrity governance lifecycle.

The architecture progresses:

Integrity Definition → Integrity Structure → Integrity Conditions → Integrity
Measurement → Integrity State → Integrity Deviation → Integrity Breach →
Integrity Response → Integrity Restoration → Integrity Assurance

Together these standards govern how integrity is formally defined,
structurally organized, objectively measured, continuously monitored,
protected against degradation, restored after verified breaches, and
continuously assured across AI systems, autonomous systems, organizations,
digital assets, critical infrastructure, and future operational environments.

Canonical Principle

INTEGROS® does not govern operational behavior or governance authority.
INTEGROS® governs the integrity conditions under which governed entities
remain objectively verifiable, resilient, recoverable, and continuously
assured throughout their complete operational lifecycle.